A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted national attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly in the delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances, an image that has considering that develop into emblematic with the depth with the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they had been intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water throughout severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the website turned One of the more placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting alternatively that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact of your coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other long once the authorized expenses have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties including environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.